- Home
- Attorney Profile
- Practice Areas
- Billing Rate Information
- Articles
- Articles-doNotDelete-ArticlesAreUnderThisButton
- The U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Lanham Act Does Not Require Attribution For Works Embodying Public Domain Materials (2003)
- 321 Studios: DVD Copying Products Violate DMCA (2004)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft: The U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Copyright Term Extension (2003)
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition: The U.S. Supreme Court Upholds the Legality of Virtual Child Pornography (2002)
- UCITA: Why Consumers Should Read The Fine Print (2002)
- Tasini: The Supreme Court's Opinion (2001)
- Internet Games: Increased Hits or Illegal Gambling? (2000)
- Tasini: The Perils of Using Independent Contractor Content (2000)
- Clearing Rights to Musical Works Under the New Copyright Term Extension Act (1999)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1999)
- Supreme Court Will Analyze Reach of Copyright Owner's Importation Right, Legal Times Intellectual Property Supplement (1998)
- Resale Royalties in the U.S. for Fine Visual Artists: An Alien Concept, 40 Journal of the Copyright Society 265 (1993) (cited in Nimmer copyright treatise).
- Some Free Legal Advice: Why You Should Register Your Trademarks And Copyrights
- MGM v. Grokster: The U.S. Supreme Court Will Revisit Sony-Betamax (2005)
- Presentations
- Television interview: MGM v. Grokster (2005)
- What Solo And Small Firm Practitioners Should Know About Intellectual Property Issues (2001)
- The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Of 1998: A Summary (1999)
- Fair Use & The Internet: A Presentation of the District of Columbia Bar Arts, Entertainment And Sports Law Section (1998)
- FAQ's
- Resource Links
- Contact Form
- MGM v. Grokster: The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (2005)
- Bad Grammar = Good Trademark? (2006)
- Marilyn Monroe: Trade Dress From Whole Cloth? (2007)
- Copyright Record Rental Exception Applies Only To Musical Works (2007)
- Site Map
- When Mandatory Arbitration Is Optional (2008)
- FairHousingCouncilvRoommates
- golan
- Tasini Update: Supreme Court Holds that Section 411(a) Registration Requirement is not Jurisdictional
